Should You Train To Failure? An introduction to RIR

Posted by Shaun LaFleur on

Too Long, Didn't Read Version

  • The closer you train to failure, the more progress you can stimulate, but the more fatigue you generate as well. Training all the way to failure, however, generates much more fatigue than it does stimulus.
  • The amount of sets you do is closely correlated with how much muscle or strength you gain. Training to failure can limit your ability to perform a large amount of quality sets.
  • You shouldn't train to failure for the majority of your sets, but training to failure still has it's uses, such as testing strength, verifying the accuracy of RIR or forcing a stronger adaptation right before a deload.

 

Introduction

A common question when it comes to resistance training is whether or not you should take your sets to failure. Should every set be an all out set where you go until your muscles can't go anymore, or do you stop just before this point? While training all out may seem like the common sense answer to making fast progress, the truth is that going to failure too often is a sure fire way to prevent progress by digging yourself into a recovery rut. When the stress you place on your body from training exceeds your capacity to recover, not only can progress slow down, but it can actually regress until you allow your body to recover. 

Recovery is just as important as training in regards to making progress. This is why it is very important to understand a concept called Reps in Reserve or RIR for short, which is the concept of not taking a set all the way to failure, but leaving a few reps left in you when you stop the set. Modern research suggests that as long as you leave 4 reps in the tank or less, you will produce an adequate hypertrophic stimulus. This means that most of your working sets should be at least 4 reps or less from failure to make adequate progress.

 

Slightly More Progress, Much More Fatigue

When comparing single sets, there is a slight increase in muscle hypertrophy when going to failure versus not going to failure. However, there is also a very large increase in training fatigue. The body becomes better and stronger once it recovers from the training fatigue built up from hard training. By constantly training to failure, you are creating a very large amount of fatigue that is very difficult to recover from on a consistent basis, yet provides little extra benefit. If you’re under recovering between workouts, each time you go into the gym you’re working at a reduced capacity, and performance begins to decrease, making it harder to progress over time. This will continue until you dial it back a bit and allow your body to recover.

By not going to failure, you’re allowing your body to get a quality training stimulus without the large increase in training fatigue. Not only is this better for the simple fact that it’s easier to recover from before you need to train again, but it allows you to also get much more work done in the same workout, as you’re left feeling much less tired out after each set. This style of training is much more productive for being able to progress consistently long term.

Take the graph above as an example. Let's say that your body is able to recover from 15 units of fatigue. This means that you want to cram in as much quality work before you reach those 15 units of fatigue in order to maximize hypertrophy. Using the graph as a reference, we can then see that each set with an RIR of 3 would give us 1 unit of hypertrophy and 1.5 units of fatigue. This means that we could perform 10 sets at an RIR of 3 before we reach our recovery limit, netting us a total of 10 units of hypertrophy. Compare this to taking your sets to failure. If you took only 3 sets to failure, you'd exceed your capacity to recover, meaning you'd have to settle for only 2 sets, netting you only 5 units of hypertrophy.

 

Easier Sets Means More Sets

In my article Understanding Volume & Fatigue, I talk about how the more sets you do, the more muscle and strength you gain (up until a certain point). Because of this, it is much better to train leaving 2-3 reps in the tank for most of your working sets than it is to immediately begin going to failure from the get go. By going to failure immediately, you make it harder to continue to perform more working sets due to the intense fatigue generated. Not only will your performance suffer on the latter sets of your workout, but if you take those sets to failure as well, you will have a hard time recovering from your workout and will be less likely to come back into the gym fully recovered on time to perform another workout. It’s much easier to perform 5 sets of squats if you leave 3 or so reps in the tank each set than if you were to go straight to failure on the first set.

By keeping reps in the tank, not only are you able to perform more total work per workout, but it’s far easier to recover from between workouts and thus allow you to train more often as well, helping drive long term progress more efficiently. A person doing 20 sets of chest per week who leaves reps in the tank will make steady progress without risk of recovery issues or injury, while a person attempting to perform 20 sets of chest to failure will dig themselves into a recovery rut within a two week period or less and begin to stall or get injured, requiring valuable time off from the gym in order to recover.

 

Training To Failure Has Its Place

Training to failure can be beneficial and has multiple uses. It can be a great tool for properly managing Reps in Reserve, because by training to failure you know how accurate your RIR estimates are for example. It can also be used as a form of additional training stimulus when you've hit a sticking point and have tried other methods to push through. When increasing volume is no longer an option, you can occasionally push the last set on some of your exercises to failure just to get a slightly stronger training stimulus. It’s important, however, that this is only done occasionally and not on every single exercise. 

Many routines also include sets where you will perform as many reps as possible (AMRAP) in order to test and/or build strength at different scheduled periods. One example is in the 5/3/1 program where you will take at least one set near or to failure every workout day.

It may also be a good idea to go to failure more often right before a scheduled deload if your current routine includes them. By doing this you can cause a stronger stimulus and still be able to recover from it when you take your deload, allowing you to take full advantage of the extra recovery potential you have coming up. Normally you would need to be recovered by the next 28-48 hours in preparation for another workout, but because of the deload, you have an entire full week to recover. It only makes sense that if you're going to have extra recovery, you might as well get an increased training stimulus as well to reap the benefits.

Going closer to failure can also be a good way to get in a stronger training stimulus when you are strapped for time and can't perform as many sets as you'd like to. Let's say that you'd typically perform 10 sets on the bench press, but you won't have the time to finish all of your sets. To make up for the lost stimulus due to having to do less sets, you can take a couple of the setst o failure to make up for the lack of total sets.

Key Takeaway

The takeaway is that while going to failure has an important place in training, namely to test strength and provide a more powerful training stimulus per set when needed, it should be used sparingly due to the large amount of training fatigued it causes. The majority of your training should be done with sets leaving 3-4 reps left in you when you rack the bar. Sets going to failure need to have a specific purpose and should be scheduled ahead of time and programmed intelligently in order to allow proper recovery. A failure to properly manage training and recovery is one of the key reasons novices and intermediates (even some advanced trainees) stall.


Share this post



← Older Post Newer Post →


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published.